March 26, 2021
21.2 Workout Analysis
By Beyond the Whiteboard
What a difference four years makes! Beyond the Whiteboard analyzes the data across all divisions in 21.2.
What a difference four years makes! Beyond the Whiteboard analyzes the data across all divisions in 21.2.

The second workout of the 2021 Open was a repeat of 17.1. The workout contained a total of 150 dumbbell snatches and 75 burpee box jump-overs with a 20-minute time cap. Although there were no high-skill movements in this workout, the ascending rep scheme on the snatches was just plain rude. We all know the motivation and hope a 50-40-30-20-10 rep scheme provides, with each subsequent round getting a little more manageable as fatigue sets in. This workout offered the polar opposite of that feeling. 

Unlike last week, where we saw less than one percent of the athletes finish the Rx’d workout, many divisions had over half the Rx’d athletes finish under the time cap.

21.2 vs. 17.1

What a difference four years makes! Across all divisions the scores on 21.2 were significantly higher than 17.1. Below is the percentile table for Rx’d individuals (18-34) for reference. As an example, the 90th percentiles for Rx’d women and men (18-34) each improved by about 2 full minutes. 

In 2017, the 50th percentile for Rx’d women (18-34) required 215 reps (10 reps short of finishing) compared to a time of 19:09 for 21.2.

graph 1

Performance by Country

For 21.2 we’re going to compare top country performance by looking at the percentage of athletes who completed the workout as Rx’d in under the time cap. The most competitive top 20 country by this metric was Sweden, with 63% of its athletes aged 16-54 completing the Rx’d workout within 20 minutes. Sweden was followed by the Russian Federation with 61%, Norway with 58%, New Zealand with 57%, and Mexico with 53%.

graph 2

21.2 Workout Analysis

This was another week of accessible movements, but that didn’t make the workout feel any easier. For 21.2, 73% of women (18-34) and 88% of men (18-34) did the workout as Rx’d, with 43% and 61% finishing under the time cap, respectively. The masters and teenagers each saw over a third of their athletes finish under the time cap.

Looking at the adaptive divisions, 57% of the athletes were able to finish their workout under the time cap compared to 39% last week on 21.1.

graph 3

The distribution of scores for the Rx’d version of the workout was pretty smooth due to the lack of high-skill movements. The distribution below has buckets grouped by movement/rep ranges as well as time. You can see where you are in the distribution by finding the bucket your score falls in on the x-axis.

Although a few of the best athletes in the world were flirting with sub-9-minute scores, only a very small percentage of athletes finished in under 12 minutes. For both divisions in the chart, you can see that more than half the Rx’d athletes were able to finish in under 20 minutes.

graph 4

Below are percentile tables for individuals, teenagers, masters, and adaptive divisions, with details for each version of the workout. You can see the breakdown of how many reps or what time it took to achieve a particular percentile. For example, for scaled men (18-34), you needed a time of 16:46 to get into the 75th percentile. You can also see the percentage of athletes who performed each version in each division.

graph 5graph 6

graph 7

graph 8

graph 9

*The data used for this article is from the official CrossFit Open submissions.

BTWB logo
CrossFit btwb is the premier workout-tracking app. Log, plan and analyze your WODs with friends at your CrossFit® box and around the world. All plans come with a 30-day free trial.